Selecting an alternative dispute resolution is a legal matter and should be performed only after consulting with an attorney. Consumers should not make this decision and the TDI should not allow the industry to prey upon those who are looking for a reduction in premiums.
From the TDI:
Docket No. 2788 - Notice of Public Meeting
Location: William P. Hobby Jr. State Office Building
333 Guadalupe, Room 100
Austin, TX
333 Guadalupe, Room 100
Austin, TX
July 06, 2016
9:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
9:30 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
The commissioner of insurance will hold a public meeting to receive written and oral comments relating to mandatory mediation-arbitration endorsements. The endorsement would be attached to a homeowners policy at the policyholder's option, with a premium discount.
See an example filed by Farm Bureau here: http://www.tdi.texas.gov/rules/financial/documents/dkt2788s614358.pdf
If you wish to provide written comments, please provide two copies no later than 5 p.m., Central time, July 6, 2016. Send one copy by email to chiefclerk@tdi.texas.gov, or by mail to the Texas Department of Insurance, Office of the Chief Clerk, Mail Code 113-2A, P.O. Box 149104, Austin, Texas 78714-9104. Send the other copy to Marilyn Hamilton by email at marilyn.hamilton@tdi.texas.gov, or by mail to the Texas Department of Insurance, Property and Casualty Lines Office, Mail Code 104-PC, P.O. Box 149104, Austin, Texas 78714-9104.
Link to Live Webcast [Link to audio will be live shortly before the meeting begins.].
For more information contact: ChiefClerk@tdi.texas.gov
5 comments:
So consumers should consult with the very attorneys who are largely responsible for driving up premiums through irresponsible lawsuits?
No. Not at all. The option to use arbitration is already available. If you think the lawyers are driving up costs, then you have the right to opt for arbitration at any point in time that you wish. You should read about mandatory binding arbitration before opening your pie hole.
Thanks John for keeping it classy. I'm familiar with how arbitration works. I'm in favor of presenting options to consumers who can choose what's best for them.
Doesn't work when you are ignorant. Most consumers are.
The only people who like the pre-dispute mandatory binding arbitration clause either works for the industry or is ignorant of the facts. Or both.
Post a Comment